Contact me at

Email: missfeeda@artandfeeda.net
Instagram: @artandfeeda


Please click the link below for the Updated: Art & Design IGCSE 0400 syllabus 2025-2026


BLOG INFORMATION

To access the BLOG ARCHIVE, please navigate to the right-hand side of your screen and scroll down to find it. When using the archive, be mindful of the references/resources organized by year. For the year 2020 onwards, you'll find references that are exclusively related to the new syllabus of 0400. These resources are invaluable for staying up-to-date with the latest curriculum and materials. For the years 2019 and those prior, you can still make use of the content for its work quality, innovative ideas, and sources of inspiration. These older references can be especially helpful for crafting ideas and guidelines to support your Component 2 ESA (new syllabus) endeavors.

Tuesday, October 3, 2023

An 80% Grade A in Art & Design IGCSE for June 2023 - a result that transformed an inquiry!

Dear everyone,

I'd like to showcase some of my student's work from June 2023 with all of you. I have received her permission to share it, and I want to thank Jidan for allowing this!

I must admit, I was quite perplexed by the assessment our students received, especially for Component 1, when graded by CAIE. I was shocked they assigned her work a 'D' grade, which I found utterly absurd!

(Before appeal)

Component 1 : D 

Component 2 : A

Overall 71% B

Please take a look at her Component 1 coursework. You'll agree that this work should not have been labelled a 'D.' Due to this lower mark in Component 1, her overall grade was a 'B' at 71%.

What's particularly baffling is that while Component 1 received a 'D,' Component 2 was graded as an 'A'! This stark contrast left me feeling frustrated, disappointed, and questioning the logic behind CAIE's marking and how it aligns with the rubric criteria in the syllabus. I know I'm not alone in these concerns.

On a positive note, I'm thankful that the student's parent decided to appeal Component 1. Based on my previous experiences, appeals rarely resulted in any changes. We anxiously awaited the outcome of Jidan's Component 1 appeal process, and FINALLY, CAIE revised her Component 1 grade from 'D' to 'A'! It's safe to say that she did not deserve a 'D,' and we all knew it.

With this revision, her overall results improved from a 'B' at 71% to an 'A' at 80%! We couldn't be happier with her achievement.

I genuinely hope that CAIE and the IGCSE Art & Design Department take a closer look at their evaluation processes for students' work. Over my 13 years of teaching and guiding IGCSE 0400, I've observed a growing, unnecessary stringency in grading. The lack of consistency in marking from one year to the next has made this subject one of the most challenging among all IGCSE subjects.

While I've been passionate about teaching this subject for over a decade, the recent inconsistent results have left me questioning my competence in a way that I shouldn't.

*************

Jidan's work can serve as an additional reference point for all of you.

WELL DONE JIDAN!

*************

Component 1, Coursework

Painting and related media

'Groceries'









Final Piece




Component 2, Externally Set Assignment (ESA)

Painting and related media

'At the race'





Final Piece



**********************


Thank you for visiting my blog.

If you have any inquiries or discussions about Art & Design IGCSE 0400, kindly email me at missfeeda@artandfeeda.net.

Please note that commenting on my previous posts might only sometimes catch my attention, as I've experienced issues with notification settings. Regrettably, I haven't received any notifications from past comments. To ensure a prompt response to your concerns, I encourage you to use email communication.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

IF YOU WANT TO USE MY STUDENTS' VISUAL SAMPLE FROM THIS BLOG OR

GUIDELINE I SHARE HERE, PLEASE DO CREDIT THIS BLOG

I WILL APPRECIATE THAT. 


4 comments:

Lau Zhen Hao said...

Well deserved A work! Absolutely not a ‘D’ grade for her component 1. This made them ungly in terms of marking consistency and appliance to the rubrics.

Feeda said...

Thank you Lau Zhen,
We are happy they adjusted the marks! Phewww!!

Anonymous said...

This revision proves that there might have been some serious issues with the initial marking. It's a relief to see her overall results improve to an 'A' at 80%.

Anonymous said...

Totally agree with you as such kind of results will leave us baffled for sure and questioning our teaching